بایدها و غایات

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد فلسفه مؤسسه داینویا، دانشگاه کاتولیک استرالیایی

چکیده

این مقاله یک معنای فروکاهشی از «باید» و یک نظریه طبیعت گرایانه از هنجاریت را مطرح می کند. نوشته حاضر یک تحلیل واحد از کاربرد پیش بینانه، ابزاری، و مطلق «باید» را ارائه می‌کند: یک باید پیش بینانه بایدی مبنایی است که بر اساس امکان تفسیر می شود. بایدهای ابزاری بر اساس بایدهای پیش بینانه که ذیل یک تعدیل کننده «به منظوری اینکه» (نظریه غایت ربطی) تحلیل می شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Anscombe, Elizabeth. (1958). ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ Philosophy 33: 1-19.
Bloomfield, Paul. (2001). Moral Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Broome, John. (1999). ‘Normative Requirements’ Ratio 12(4): 398-419.
Copley, Bridget. (2006). ‘What should should mean?’ Language Under Uncertainty Workshop, Kyoto University, January 2005, 2006. halshs-00093569
Dreier, Jamie. (2009). ‘Practical Conditionals’.In D. Sobel & S. Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press, pp. 116-133.
Finlay, Stephen. (2004). ‘The Conversational Practicality of Value Judgement’ Journal of Ethics 8(3): 205-224.
Finlay, Stephen. (2005). ‘Value and Implicature’ Philosophers’ Imprint 5(4); http://www.philosophersimprint.org/005/004
Finlay, Stephen. (2006). ‘The Reasons that Matter’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84: 1-20.
Finlay, Stephen. (2007). ‘Too Much Morality’ in Paul Bloomfield (ed.) Morality & Self-Interest. New York: Oxford University Press.
Finlay, Stephen. (2009). ‘Against All Reason? Skepticism about the Instrumental Norm’ in Charles Pigden (ed.) Hume on Motivation and Virtue. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 155-178.
Finlay, Stephen. (2010). ‘What Ought Probably Means, and Why You Can’t Detach It,’ Synthese 177(1): 67-89.
Von Fintel, Kai & Iatridou, Sabine. (2006a). ‘What to Do If You Want to Go to Harlem: Anankastic Conditionals and Related Matters’ [online]. Available from http://mit.edu/fintel/www/harlem-rutgers.pdf [9/1/2006].
von Fintel, Kai & Iatridou, Sabine. (2006b). ‘On the Interaction of Modals, Quantifiers, and If-Clauses’ [online]. Available from http://web.mit.edu/fintel/www/mqi.pdf  [9/1/2006].
Von Fintel, Kai & Iatridou, Sabine. (2008). ‘How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals.’ In Guéron, J., Lecarme, J. (eds.), Time and Modality. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 75. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 115-141.
Foot, Philippa. (1972). ‘Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives’ The Philosophical Review 81: 305-316.
Foot, Philippa. (2001). Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geach, Peter. (1991). ‘Whatever Happened to Deontic Logic?’ in Geach (ed.) Logic and Ethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gibbard, Allan. (2003). Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, Paul. (1989). ‘Logic and Conversation’ Reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hampton, Jean. (1998). The Authority of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, Gilbert. (1973). Review of R. Wertheimer, The Significance of Sense. Philosophical Review 82: 235-239.
Hill Jr., Thomas. (1973). ‘The Hypothetical Imperative’ The Philosophical Review 82(4): 429-450.
Joyce, Richard. (2001). The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine. (1997). ‘The Normativity of Instrumental Reason’ in Cullity & Gaut (eds.) Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kratzer, Angelika. (1977). ‘What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean’ Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337-355.
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth & New York: Penguin Books.
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. (2001). ‘Necessary Conditions in a Natural Language’ in Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.) Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow. Akademie Verlag.
Schroeder, Mark. (2004). ‘The Scope of Instrumental Reason’ Philosophical Perspectives 18: 337-364.
Schroeder, Mark. (2005). ‘The Hypothetical Imperative’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 357-72.
Schroeder, Mark. (2011). ‘Ought, Agents, and Actions’ The Philosophical Review 120(1): 1-41.
Setiya, Kieran. (2007). ‘Cogntivism about Instrumental Reason’ Ethics 117: 649-73.
Sloman, Aaron. (1970). ‘Ought and BetterMind 79: 385-394.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. (2007). ‘Normativity’ in Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 2. New York: Oxford University Press.
Velleman, J. David. (2000). The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, R. Jay. (2001). ‘Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason’ Philosophers’ Imprint 1 (3): http://www.philosophersimprint.org/001003
Wedgwood, Ralph. (2006). ‘The Meaning of ‘Ought’’ in Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 1.
Williams, Bernard. (1981). ‘Ought and Obligation’ in his Moral Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1997). ‘Lecture on Ethics’ in Darwall, Gibbard & Railton (eds.) Moral Discourse and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.