Ethical Reflections

Ethical Reflections

Surveillance, Censorship, and Educational Technology

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Adjunct faculty member, Computer Science Department, Southern Connecticut State University, USA,
10.30470/er.2024.2032439.1340
Abstract
Corporate surveillance and data collection have become routine in primary, secondary, and higher education. In the United States, the Fourth Amendment is the basis of privacy laws that protect citizens against surveillance. However, businesses and governments circumvent this amendment and its associated privacy laws. Multinational corporations such as Ellucian and Anthology collect personal data through educational products such as Banner and Blackboard. Personal information under the purview of corporations includes data on religion, ethnicity, ideology, political activity, health, and sexual activity. In addition to providing a discussion of Ellucian’s data collection practices, this study discusses other businesses that trade in personal data — e.g., Google and YouTube — as well as a report on surveillance of schoolchildren published by Human Rights Watch. The purpose of this study is to shed light on corporate surveillance and data collection in schools and universities by analyzing and discussing material such as Ellucian’s privacy notice, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision, Carpenter v. United States. In addition, the political contexts of surveillance and censorship are considered. Among the findings are: (1) Surveillance and censorship work in unison; both rest on asymmetrical power relations; (2) Corporate executives and government officials have usurped the prerogative of educators; and (3) Educators are plagued by an inversion of values: the ability of students and teachers to communicate and share information is hindered by those who measure success in financial terms. Given these circumstances, educators and students are incapable of self-determination.
Keywords
Subjects

Article Title Persian

نظارت، سانسور و فناوری آموزشی

Author Persian

آنتونی مایکل پاسکوالونی
استاد مدعو، گروه علوم کامپیوتر، دانشگاه ساوترن کانکتیکت استیت، ایالات متحده آمریکا.
Abstract Persian

نظارت شرکتی و گردآوری داده‌ها به امری عادی در آموزش ابتدایی، متوسطه و آموزش عالی تبدیل شده است. در ایالات متحده، متمم چهارم قانون اساسی مبنای قوانین حریم خصوصی است که از شهروندان در برابر نظارت‌های غیرموجه حمایت می‌کند. با این حال، شرکت‌ها و دولت‌ها با دور زدن این متمم و قوانین مرتبط با حریم خصوصی، به جمع‌آوری و بهره‌برداری از داده‌های شخصی ادامه می‌دهند. شرکت‌های چندملیتی مانند Ellucian و Anthology از طریق محصولات آموزشی خود، از جمله Banner و Blackboard، داده‌های شخصی کاربران را جمع‌آوری می‌کنند. اطلاعات شخصی‌ای که در اختیار این شرکت‌ها قرار می‌گیرد، شامل داده‌هایی درباره مذهب، قومیت، ایدئولوژی، فعالیت‌های سیاسی، وضعیت سلامت و فعالیت‌های جنسی افراد است. این پژوهش، افزون بر بررسی شیوه‌های جمع‌آوری داده توسط شرکت Ellucian، به سایر شرکت‌هایی که در زمینه خرید و فروش داده‌های شخصی فعالیت می‌کنند ــ مانند Google و YouTube ــ نیز می‌پردازد. همچنین گزارشی از سازمان دیده‌بان حقوق بشر درباره نظارت بر دانش‌آموزان نیز مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد. هدف این مطالعه، روشن ساختن ابعاد نظارت شرکتی و گردآوری داده‌ها در مدارس و دانشگاه‌ها از طریق تحلیل و بررسی اسنادی همچون اعلامیه حریم خصوصی Ellucianقانون حقوق آموزشی و حریم خصوصی خانواده و رأی تاریخی دیوان عالی ایالات متحده در پرونده Carpenter v. United States است. افزون بر این، زمینه‌های سیاسیِ نظارت و سانسور نیز مورد توجه قرار گرفته‌اند. از جمله یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌توان به موارد زیر اشاره کرد: 1) نظارت و سانسور به‌صورت هم‌افزا و در کنار یکدیگر عمل می‌کنند و هر دو بر روابط قدرت نامتقارن استوار هستند. 2) مدیران شرکت‌ها و مقامات دولتی، اختیارات و صلاحیت‌های حرفه‌ایِ مربیان و معلمان را به نفع خود مصادره کرده‌اند. 3) نظام آموزشی با نوعی وارونگی ارزش‌ها مواجه است؛ به گونه‌ای که توانایی دانشجویان، دانش‌آموزان و معلمان برای برقراری ارتباط و به اشتراک گذاشتن اطلاعات، توسط کسانی محدود می‌شود که موفقیت را صرفاً بر اساس معیارهای مالی می‌سنجند.در چنین شرایطی، معلمان و دانشجویان از توانایی تعیین سرنوشت و تصمیم‌گیری مستقل برای خود محروم می‌شوند.

Keywords Persian

اخلاق
نظارت
گردآوری داده‌ها
سانسور
آموزش
فناوری
پول
Adobe Inc. (2024a). Marketo Engage. Retrieved June 5, 2024, from https://business.adobe.com/products/marketo/adobe-marketo.html
     See also https://archive.is/ObOq9
Adobe Inc. (2024b). Marketo Engage: Features. Retrieved June 5, 2024, from https://business.adobe.com/products/marketo/features.html#content-intelligence
     See also https://archive.is/Cyh2N
Alphabet. (n.d.). Investor Relations. https://abc.xyz/
American University School of Education. (2018, Sept. 7). The Future of Education Technology.
Blackstone Inc. (2024). The Firm. Retrieved June 4, 2024, from https://www.blackstone.com/the-firm/
Carpenter v. United States, 138 Supreme Court 2206, 2214 (2018).
Carroll, L. (1992). Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. William Morrow & Co., Inc. (Original work published 1866).
Dugina, D. (2022). Daria Douguine: la guerre en Ukraine, « un choc des civilisations mondialiste et eurasienne ». BREIZH-INFO, May 25, 2022. https://t.ly/odN5x      
Ellucian Company L.P. (2023a). Ellucian Subprocessors, v09272023. Retrieved June 4, 2024, from https://www.ellucian.com/assets/en/ellucian-subprocessor-list-partners-names.pdf
Ellucian Company L.P. (2023b). Laredo College’s Ambitious SaaS Transformation.
Ellucian Company L.P. (2024a). Neltnet Campus Commerce. Retrieved June 3, 2024, from
Ellucian Company L.P. (2024b). Partner Network. Retrieved June 3, 2024, from
Ellucian Company L.P. (2024c). Powering What's Next in Higher Education Technology. Retrieved June 5, 2024, from https://www.ellucian.com/about-us
Ellucian Company L.P. (2024d). Student Success Starts Here. Retrieved June 3, 2024, from
Ellucian Company L.P. (2024, April). Privacy Notice. Retrieved June 3, 2024, from
Ellucian Company L.P. (2024, May). Cookie Declaration. Retrieved June 4, 2024, from
FBI Richmond. (2023, Jan. 23). Domain Perspective: (U//FOUO) Interest of Racially or
Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical-Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities. Threat Target/Facilitation Platform. Retrieved June 5, 2024, from https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/fbi-anti-catholic-memo.pdf
Good Jobs First. (2024). Violation Tracker (2024) [Data set].
Google. (n.d.). Helpful products. Built with you in mind. About Google. Retrieved June 4, 2024,
Hegel, G.W.F. (2019). The Phenomenology of Spirit (P. Fuss & J. Dobbins, Trans.). University of
Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1807).
Human Rights Watch. (2022, May 25). “How Dare They Peep into My Private Life?”:
Children’s Rights Violations by Governments that Endorsed Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic.
Johri, A. (2022, May). Out of Control. Prism, May 2022.
Knies, K. (2023). Plato’s Critique of Scientific Management in Charmides. ΣΧΟΛΗ 17(1), 7-28. https://classics.nsu.ru/schole/assets/files/17-1-knies.pdf
Mattu, S., & Sankin, A. (2020, September 22). How We Built a Real-time Privacy Inspector. The        Markup, September 22, 2020.
McDonald, M. (2022, Aug. 31). ‘Honestly, I Don’t Want to’ Hire Catholics, Connecticut School
McFarland, M. (2012, Jun 1). Ethical Implications of Data Aggregation. Markkula Center for
Miyares, J., Marshall, S., Taylor, T., Griffin, T., Carr, C., Labrador, R., … Morrisey, P. (2023,
Feb. 10). [Re: Federal Bureau of Investigation Infiltrating Catholic Congregations]. Retrieved June 5, 2024, from:
Nelnet Business Services. (2024a). Nelnet Payment Analytics. Retrieved June 4, 2024, from
Nelnet Business Services. (2024b). Part II: A Deep Dive Into the Six Tenets of Nelnet’s DNA. Retrieved
Oct. 23, 2024, from
Persson, J. (2019, Nov. 15). Children’s Data Protection in Education Systems: Challenges and
Pew Research Center. (2022, August 10). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2022.
Pichierri, F. (2021, Aug. 13). Surveil to Manipulate in the Name of National Security: State
Interference with Citizen Mental Sphere Via the Use of Information and Information Technologies. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3888396
Rahtz, J., & Zetsche, A. (2021, July). Rhetoric and Reality of Disinformation in the European
Sacred Heart University. (2018, May 22). Privacy Statement. Retrieved June 3, 2024, from
Sacred Heart University. (2022). Notification of Rights Under FERPA. Retrieved June 4, 2024,
Sacred Heart University. (2024). Privacy of Records. Retrieved June 4, 2024, from
Shaheed, A. (2021, Oct. 5). Freedom of religion or belief : note. United Nations Digital Library.
Southern Connecticut State University (2021). SCSU Faculty Senate President’s Report – March
Southern Connecticut State University. (2022). FERPA. Inside Southern. Retrieved June 4, 2024,
United States Department of Labor. (2023, Feb. 17). News Release: More than 100 children
illegally employed in hazardous jobs, federal investigation finds; food sanitation contractor pays $1.5M in penalties. Retrieved June 4, 2024, from https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20230217-1
The World Bank. (2024). GDP (current US$): All Countries and Economies. Retrieved June 4,
Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25
Spring 2026
Pages 145-180

  • Receive Date 15 June 2024
  • Revise Date 05 November 2024
  • Accept Date 08 November 2024